1981 Fleer Darrell Evans #56
Darrell Evans · Fleer · Base

Player
Darrell Evans
Set
1981 Fleer Baseball
Year
1981
Card #
56
Condition Grade
PSA 5 (EX) to PSA 6 (EX-MT). Centering is slightly heavy to the right edge and bottom border. Corners show mild softening and minor wear. Edges have some slight chipping along the borders. Surface shows minor gloss loss and light scuffing typical of early 1980s Fleer cards.
Category
Base
Manufacturer
Fleer
Demand Level
Low. Primarily of interest to set builders and team collectors focusing on the San Francisco Giants or Darrell Evans career collectors.
Valuation
Raw (Ungraded) Value
$0.50 - $2.00
Graded Value
PSA 5: $5 - $10, PSA 6: $10 - $15, PSA 7: $15 - $25
Comparable Sales
Recent raw sales for common 1981 Fleer cards in similar condition typically range from $0.50 to $1.50 on eBay and COMC.
Description
Offering a vintage 1981 Fleer baseball card featuring third baseman Darrell Evans of the San Francisco Giants. The front features a clear action photograph of Evans holding a bat with the Giants logo in the upper left corner and his name and position vertically on the left border. The classic white border design is standard for Fleer's landmark 1981 set.
Key Features
Part of Fleer's historic first nationwide set release following the landmark antitrust lawsuit against Topps in 1980. Features veteran star Darrell Evans during his tenure with the San Francisco Giants.
Authenticity Indicators
High confidence in authenticity. Standard 1981 Fleer card stock, correct font types, and proper printing characteristics with no signs of trimming.
Flaws to Note
Slightly off-center framing favoring the right side and bottom. Softened corners with mild rounding and minor edge chipping consistent with moderate handling and storage over time.
Selling Guide
Where to Sell
COMC, eBay (as part of a bulk lot or low-cost single), or local card shops.
Selling Tips
Due to the low individual value of this raw vintage card, it is best sold raw as part of a complete set or team lot to maximize shipping efficiency, rather than grading which would cost more than the card's final value.